Anonymous Posts

Clearly, it can already be seen that it was our mistake to leave open the right to make anonymous comments. But we are not going to stop that avenue for people to post should they so wish.

The first post we recieved on this blog was anonymous. Stated that a presnt campaign for a museum had done more in three weeks to raise awareness, than Axis had in 17 years.

In my experience. All campaigns for museums in Barry have had that innitial rush. When they can situate themselves in the public eye. So would say in all repsect, it is far to early to go making bold statements like that above. This needs some explanation.

Lets say anonymous, is a public visitor to an exhibition. How would one be able to make that assesment, without having access to documented evidence. Secondly, its normally those at the top of organisation, which would have access to all important data. Thirdly, if the campaign is going so well. Why do others posts, posted under anonymous, not only ask for us to come onboard. But actually make request for us to show them the way.

Such contradictory statements, leads me to quite obvious question. If this recent "Renewed" campaign for a mueum in Barry is going so well. Why do they want our society onboard? After all the innitial anonymous poster did say, that, the recent campaign had done more then we had in 17 years. Anybody that does maths, will clearly see in an instant. That 17 years into 3 weeks does not go. Would you really want an organisation aroud that took 17 years to do what could be done in 3 weeks.? Puzzled. Your comments welcome.